2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 22748
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMANPREET KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
PANKAJ DAYAL – Respondent
CS(COMM)-175/2020
CS(COMM) 175/2020
Page 1 of 21
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 28.02.2023
Date of decision: 27.03.2023
+
CS(COMM) 175/2020
AMANPREET KOHLI
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr.Arjun Singh Bawa,
Ms.Sambhavi M., Advs.
versus
PANKAJ DAYAL
..... Defendant
Through:
Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Mr.Amit
Khanna,
Mr.Aman
Dhyani,
Mr.Raj Vardhan, Ms.Kanchan
Samwal,
Mr.Kunal
Arora,
Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
IA 8177/2022
1.
This application has been filed by the plaintiff under Order
XIIIA of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as applicable to the
Commercial Disputes of a specified value, (hereinafter referred to as
„CPC‟), inter alia,praying for the following reliefs:
Three Hundred and Sixty].‖
Digitally Signed By:SUNIL
Signing Date:28.03.2023
01:29:47
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 175/2020
Page 2 of 21
CASE OF THE PLAINTIFF
2.
It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff is engaged in the
business of Real Estate Development and Construction. The plaintiff
has known the defendant for several years as the defendant is also
engaged in the business of Real Estate. The parties entered into a
congenial formal relationship. Sometime in the month of August
2016, the defendant approached the plaintiff and requested him for
financial assistance to tide over his financial distress. The defendant
promised the plaintiff to return the loan within a short period of time
along with interest, on the assurance that he has various prospective
business opportunities maturing soon which will enable him to repay
the entire loan amount with interest. Based on such assurances, the
plaintiff lent a sum of Rs.4,30,00,000/- (Rupees Four Crores Thirty
Lakhs only) to the defendant in August, 2016. The defendant assured
and promised the plaintiff that he would repay the said loan amount
along with an interest of Rs.20 Lakhs within a period of eight months
from the disbursement of the said loan. The Loan Agreement dated
01.09.2016 recording the agreed rate of interest on the principal
amount of Rs.4,30,00,000/- as 6.976% p.a. was executed between the
parties. The plaintiff further asserts that apart from the Loan
Agreement, the defendant also executed a Promissory Note dated
01.09.2016 and issued the following three Post-Dated Cheques,
collectively for an amount of Rs.4,50,00,000/-, in favour of the
plaintiff:
S.No. CHEQUE
NO
CHEQUE
DATE
AMOUNT
DRAWN
ON
1. 035498
01.03.2017 INR
1,50,00,000
Axis Bank
Limited,
Digitally Signed By:SUNIL
Signing Date:28.03.2023
01:29:47
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 175/2020
Page 3 of 21
Lajpat
Nagar,
New Delhi
2. 035499
01.04.2017 INR
1,50,00,000
Axis Bank
Limited,
Lajpat
Nagar,
New Delhi
3. 035500
01.05.2017 INR
1,50,00,000
Axis Bank
Limited,
Lajpat
Nagar,
New Delhi
3.
The plaintiff asserts that after receiving the sum of
Rs.4,30,00,000/-, the defendant ceased all contact and the plaintiff was
unable to reach or communicate with him for many weeks altogether.
Sometime in January 2017, the plaintiff and his wife accidentally ran
into the defendant at the Defence Colony market. The plaintiff
confronted the defendant and inquired from him about the reason for
severing all contact with the plaintiff and whether the plaintiff would
be receiving a sum of Rs.4,30,00,000/- as the date of presentation of
the cheque was approaching. The defendant assured the plaintiff that
he had sufficient funds to fulfill his obligations under the Loan
Agreement and the cheques would be duly encashed on presentation.
4.
In March 2017, however, when the plaintiff again approached
the defendant to inquire whether the cheques would be honoured upon
presentation, the defendant showed his inability to honour the cheques
and sought some additional time to re-pay the loan amount. The
defendant assured that in the month of May 2017 he would have
sufficient funds in order to f