SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 2770

$~24

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CS(OS) 13/2023

VASIM SAIFI

..... Plaintiff

Through:

Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate

versus

SUNIL BHAT & ANR.

..... Defendants

Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH

Advocates:
VIRENDRA SINGH

A party seeking specific performance of a contract must show that they have a valid contract, that they have performed their obligations under the contract, and that they will suffer irreparable harm if the contract is not specifically enforced.

Headnote:

CONTRACT - SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE - INJUNCTION - [The court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from creating any third-party interest or changing the nature of the property in dispute until the final disposal of the suit, as the plaintiff had made a prima facie case for specific performance of the contract and irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted.]

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff entered into an agreement to purchase a property from the defendant no. 1 and paid a substantial amount towards the purchase price. However, the defendant no. 1 later sold the property to the defendants no. 2 and 3. The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the contract and an injunction to restrain the defendants from creating any third-party interest or changing the nature of the property.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the plaintiff had made a prima facie case for specific performance of the contract and that he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted. The court also noted that the defendants had not filed any reply to the plaintiff's application for an injunction.

Issues: Whether the plaintiff had made a prima facie case for specific performance of the contract?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the plaintiff had made a prima facie case for specific performance of the contract and that he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction was not granted.

Final Decision: The court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from creating any third-party interest or changing the nature of the property in dispute until the final disposal of the suit.

%

09.01.2023

I.A. 208/2023 (Exemption)

Subject to the plaintiff filing the clear, original and legible/typed

copies of any dim documents on which the plaintiff may seek to place

reliance, within four weeks from today, exemption is granted for the present.

The application is disposed of.

I.A. 209/2023 (Delay in re-filing)

1.

The instant application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has been

filed on behalf of the plaintiff seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the

suit.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the

delay of 4 days in re-filing is condoned.

3.

The application stands disposed of.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2024 at 16:29:44

CS(OS) 13/2023

1.

The instant plaint has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff for

declaration, specific performance of contract with possession, along with

consequential relief of permanent injunction inter alia seeking the following

reliefs:-

It is therefore most respectfully prayed that in the facts and

circumstances mentioned herein above, the Hon'ble Court may

kindly be pleased to pass a decree of declaration in favour of

plaintiff and against the defendants 1, 2& 3, to declare the sale

deed dated 16.08.2021,registered as registration no. 2023 in

book no. 1 volume no. 5288 on pages 46 to 57 dated

16.08.2021, in respect of Property No. 54 Area measuring 200

sq.yrds., out of Khasra No. 166/4, 209/143, and 207/143/ min,

situated at Village Ghonda Gujran Bangar in the abadi North

Ghonda Delhi-110053, which has been shown as red in the site

plan annexed with plaint, executed by defendant no. 1 in favour

of defendant no.2 as null and void, for the reason being that

same got executed by means/using the fraud, misrepresentation,

undue influence upon the plaintiff and also under conspiracy of

defendant no. 2 and 3 with their associates, and there after the

copy of the same may be sand to Sub Registrar Office for his

record.

The Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to pass a decree of

specific performance of contract dated 13.07.2017,with

possession in favour of plaintiff and against the defendants 1, 2

& 3, in respect of Property No. 54 Area measuring 200

sq.yrds., out of Khasra No. 166/4, 209/143, and 207/143/min,

situated at Village Ghonda Gujran Bangar in the abadi North

Ghonda Delhi-110053, which has been shown as red in the site

plan annexed with plaint, by directing the defendant no. 1 to

execute the title deed in favour of plaintiff, after receiving the

remaining consideration amount as per law.

The Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to pass a decree of

permanent injunction in favour of plaintiff and against the

defendants 1, 2& 3in respect of Property No. 54 Area

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2024 at 16:29:44

measuring 200 sq.yrds., out of Khasra No. 166/4, 209/143, and

207/143/ min, situated at Village Ghonda Gujran Bangar in the

ahadi North Ghonda Delhi-110053, which has been shown as

red in the site plan filed with plaint, not to create any third

party interest in the same

Any other or further relief, which the Hon'ble Court may deem

fit and proper under the circumstances of suit may also be

granted in favour of plaintiff and against the defendants .

Cost of the suit may also be awarded In favour of plaintiff and

against the defendants.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff submitted that

late Sh. Brij Nath Bhatt was the owner and in possession of a piece of land

measuring about 250 sq. yds. out of khasra no. 166/4, 209/143 and 207/143

situated at Village Ghonda Gujran Bangar, Shahdra, Delhi.

3.

It is submitted that on 11th November, 2015, Sunil Bhat i.e. defendant

no. 1 receive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top