DELHI HIGH COURT
SMT. HEM MADAN – Appellant
Versus
MR. PAWAN CHOWDHRI & ANR. – Respondent
CS(OS) 486/2019 Page 1 of 12
$~19
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of decision: 09th January, 2024
+
CS(OS) 486/2019, CRL.M.A. 1/2022, I.A. 13002/2019, I.A.
12314/2020, I.A. 2359/2021, I.A. 54/2022, I.A. 19222/2022, O.A.
53/2022
SMT. HEM MADAN
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr. Shreshth Jain, Advocate.
Versus
MR. PAWAN CHOWDHRI & ANR.
..... Defendants
Through:
Mr. Varun Jain and Mr. Nikhil
Fernandes, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
J U D G M E N T (oral)
I.A. 19037/2022 (seeking rejection of plaint on account of payment of
deficit Court free):
1.
An application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1906 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC") read with Section 151
CPC has been filed by defendant No. 2 for the rejection of plaint on account
of payment of deficit court fee.
2.
A suit for Declaration, Partition and Rendition of Accounts has been
filed by the plaintiff, claiming to be a co-owner in the estate of her father
late Shri Tek Chand Anand, who expir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.