SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 18544

DELHI HIGH COURT
SMT. HEM MADAN – Appellant
Versus
MR. PAWAN CHOWDHRI & ANR. – Respondent


CS(OS) 486/2019 Page 1 of 12

$~19

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 09th January, 2024

+

CS(OS) 486/2019, CRL.M.A. 1/2022, I.A. 13002/2019, I.A.

12314/2020, I.A. 2359/2021, I.A. 54/2022, I.A. 19222/2022, O.A.

53/2022

SMT. HEM MADAN

..... Plaintiff

Through:

Mr. Shreshth Jain, Advocate.

Versus

MR. PAWAN CHOWDHRI & ANR.

..... Defendants

Through:

Mr. Varun Jain and Mr. Nikhil

Fernandes, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

J U D G M E N T (oral)

I.A. 19037/2022 (seeking rejection of plaint on account of payment of

deficit Court free):

1.

An application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil

Procedure, 1906 (hereinafter referred to as "CPC") read with Section 151

CPC has been filed by defendant No. 2 for the rejection of plaint on account

of payment of deficit court fee.

2.

A suit for Declaration, Partition and Rendition of Accounts has been

filed by the plaintiff, claiming to be a co-owner in the estate of her father

late Shri Tek Chand Anand, who expir

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top