HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR SANJAY ARORA – Appellant
Versus
JASMER – Respondent
ORDER
% I.A. 14318/2022 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC)
1. This application has been filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC as part of accompanying suit seeking permanent injunction restraining defendant and all those acting for and on his behalf from manufacturing, selling, using, displaying, advertising, importing, exporting or in any other manner dealing with impugned goods and products bearing the Page 2/25 trademark/device/label and or any other trade mark/label/device identical with or deceptively similar to plaintiffs trademark/label/device ‘TIGER’/ .
2. Notice in the application was issued on 6th September, 2022. On 29th February, 2024, when submissions were heard on behalf of counsel for plaintiff, a set of additional documents filed on 1st March, 2023 were adverted to. However, as the counsel for defendant stated that he did not have a copy of the same, it was directed that documents be supplied to defendant, despite the fact that they were filed one year prior.
3. On 29th February, 2024, two photographs were adverted to by counsel for plaintiff to show that in 2014, defendant was actually an employee of plaintiff, who had already been using the register
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.