SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 19037

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BHARAT BHUSHAN DUA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
DEEPAK SAWHNEY – Respondent


Advocates:
DEEKSHA LADI KAKAR

ORDER

% 22.05.2024 CM APPL. 31088/2024

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application shall stand disposed of.

C.R.P. 161/2024 and CM APPL. 31087/2024

3. The petitioner who is defendant in the suit under Order 37 CPC instituted by the respondent/plaintiff assails the impugned order dated 26.03.2024 passed by learned Presiding Officer, (Commercial Court

03) (South-East) Saket Courts, New Delhi.

4. None is present for the respondent despite sending advance notice.

5. It would be apposite to refer to the observations made by the learned trial court while deciding the application under Order XXXVII The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/05/2024 at 12:30:42

Rule 3 CPC which goes as under :

8. The case of the plaintiff is based on the invoices as well as the ledger statement and long standing business relationship which was previously with proprietor ship firm, however, later on turned into partnership firm. Under Commercial Courts Act, the suit can be filed on the basis of photocopies. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff submitted that plaintiff having possession of the original documents, therefore, mere non filing of the same do not in any manner could be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top