SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 18609

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Mini Pushkarna, J
DEVENDER SINGH KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. – Respondent
W.P.(C) 4467/2024



Advocates:
AADITYA CHOPRA

Public authorities must ensure access to land, and a writ of mandamus can compel them to perform their duties when a clear right exists.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Development Act - Right of Way - Writ petition filed seeking direction for the designation and development of a right of way to un-acquired agricultural land - Petitioner contended that without such designation, the land would be left land locked - DDA agreed to treat the petition as a representation - Court directed DDA to consider the representation expeditiously. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Mandamus - The court can issue a writ of mandamus to compel a public authority to perform its duty when there is a clear right and corresponding duty. (Paras 1-6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought a right of way to his un-acquired agricultural land in Village Mamurpur, Narela, Delhi, which would be left land locked without such access.

Findings of Court:
The court directed that the writ petition be treated as a representation to the DDA, which must consider it in a timely manner.

Issues: The main issue was whether the DDA should be compelled to secure a right of way for the petitioner’s land.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the necessity for public authorities to ensure access to land and the importance of treating the petition as a representation for proper consideration.

Result: Petition disposed of with directions.

ORDER

% 02.04.2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:

    “a. Issue appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing respondent no.

1 to declare/designate/earmark and develop 12 meter or of any other width way from Respondent/DDA, pocket- 11, leading to un-acquired agricultural land of petitioner bearing Kh. No. 54/3/2 (2-14) of Village Mamurpur, Narela, Delhi.

b. Writ, order or direction restraining Respondent/DDA to not to construct a wall stopping rasta of Petitioner leading to his un- acquired land bearing Kh. No. 54/3/2 (2-14) of Village Mamurpur, Narela, Delhi, through Pocket-11 Sector A1 to A4, Narela, Delhi.

c.

Issue appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent/DDA to include way leading to land of Petitioner in their pocket layout.

xxx xxx xxx”

2. Learned Senior Counsel for petitioner submits that the un-acquired land of the petitioner would be left land locked, if Delhi Development Authority (“DDA”) is not directed to secure the Right of Way to the petitioner leading to his un-acquired land. He submits that the petitioner is aggrieved as the DDA is not earmarking the Right of Way leading to petitioner’s un-acquired land in layout of Pocket-11, Sector A-1 to A-4, Narela, Delhi. He further submits that petitioner’s un-acquired land falls in Khasra No. 54/3/2 (2-14), that would be left land locked if the Right of Way of the petitioner to his land is not secured.

3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be satisfied, if the present writ petition of the petitioner is treated as a representation, so that the same can be decided by the DDA by way of a speaking order.

5. Learned Standing Counsel for the DDA has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.

6. Accordingly, it is directed that the present writ petition shall be treated as a representation by the DDA. The DDA shall grant opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his authorized representative before passing any order on the representation of the petitioner. The representation of the petitioner shall be considered in a time bound manner and the same shall be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today.

7. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top