Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
RAJA HALDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against conviction (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments by the appellant's counsel (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's reasoning on victim's testimony (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. conviction modified (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
J U D G M E N T
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA,J:
1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) , challenging judgment dated 13.05.2021 and order on sentence dated 03.08.2021, passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge-06 (POCSO), South East, Saket Courts, Delhi, in Case No. S.C. 428/2018, FIR No. 242/2018, under Section 376 AB of the IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act registered at PS Govind Puri, Delhi, whereby the appellant was convicted. The learned Trial Court vide order on sentence dated 03.08.2021 awarded rigorous imprisonment for 20 CRL.A. 288/2021 Page 1 of 30 Signature Not Verified years and fine of Rs. 10,000/-; in default of payment of the fine, the appellant was to undergo simple imprisonment for 1 month.
2. The facts in brief as recorded by the Ld. Trial Court are as under:
“2. Brief facts le
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
