Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN, J
DURGESH PAUL SACHDEV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to summon records (Para 1) |
| 2. allegations of fraud and misrepresentation (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 3. charges filed against respondents (Para 4) |
| 4. trial court's dismissal of application (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. importance of evidence for just decision (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:
a. set aside the impugned order dated 17.09.2019 passed by the Court of Ms. Nupur Gupta, M.M. Saket Courts, New Delhi in Case FIR No.24/07, P.S. Kotla Mubarakpur, u/s 420/120B IRC and;
b. allow the application filed by the petitioner/complainant for summoning the concerned clerk/ahlmad/Record Keepers along Signature Not Verified with record of case titled State Bank of Patiala vs. Asiatic Overseas Pvt. Ltd. &Ors., being Civil Suit No.467/1993 (earlier No.1224/89) decided by the Court of Ms. Pratibha Rani, the then ADJ, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and of case titled 'M.M. Rai Khanna vs. State Bank of Patiala & Ors.', being petition no.CM(M) No.349/2013, decided by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi and/or;
2. The FIR No. 24/2007 dated 16.01
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
