SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11833

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SAHAMAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)

1. By way of the present petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the „A&C Act‟), the petitioner seeks appointment of Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute has arisen out of the work order dated 12.10.2015 awarded by the respondent to the petitioner. The agreement entered into between the parties for Terminal Transportation of Loaded / Empty Containers Contractor For Container Corporation Of India Ltd at ICD/TKD.

3. The arbitration clause between the parties is not disputed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was required to install GPS and VMTs in the trailers with suitable compatibility with the Respondent's CCLS System. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the petitioner was informed that MIS department officers of the respondent were in process of making changes / update in the Company’s CCLS system and therefore, the delay took place.

5. Learned counsel submits that finally the VMTs with suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top