J U D G M E N T

MANMOHAN, J: (ORAL)

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 23rd December, 2022 passed by the learned District Judge, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in CS (COMM) No.3777/2021, wherein the application for leave to defend filed by the appellant was dismissed and the suit was decreed for an amount of Rs.7,10,062/- against the appellant.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the Trial Court failed to give an opportunity to the appellant to prove her case on merits. According to him, various triable issues like furnishing of blank security cheques, transactions of Rs.1,89,431/- as well as Rs.6,40,000/- not being admitted and full purchase price having been paid were raised by the appellant in the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:JASWANT leave to defend application. He contends that without allowing the parties to lead evidence, the said disputes could not have been decided.

3. In our view, the Trial Court has correctly held that the appellant had not placed any document on record from which it could be ascertained that there was any compelling circumstance for the appellant to purchase goods from the respondent alone an