SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 9339

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TARAK NATH GUPTA & ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI & ANR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

AMIT SHARMA, J.

1. The present petition under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („CrPC‟) seeks the following prayers:

“(i) to call and examine the record of trial court and set-aside the impugned order dated 01.02.2019 passed by Shri Ajay Kumar Jain, Ld. A.S.J.-02, South District, Saket Court, New Delhi in the matter of State Versus Swatantra Kumar Jaysawal, bearing SC No. 49/2016, FIR No.

2038/15, U/S 498A/304B/306 IPC P.S. Malviya Nagar, New Delhi, OR (ii) any other relief which this Hon‟ble court may deem fit and proper, in the interest of justice.”

2. The facts of the case are that FIR No. 2038/2015 was registered under Sections 498A/304B of the IPC at PS Malviya Nagar, at the instance of petitioner no. 1, Sh. Tarak Nath Gupta who stated that his daughter was CRL.REV.P. 472/2019 Page 1 of 15 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RANJU BHALLA married to respondent no. 2, Sh. Swatantra Kumar Jaysawal in the year 2010. It was further alleged that thereafter, respondent no. 2 secured a good job in year 2012 and started harassing the complainant‟s daughter, as a result of which she committed suicide by hanging herself at Khirki Village on

25.10.2015.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top