SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 8803

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SATYAPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER P.O.L.C.& ANR. – Respondent


ORDER

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral)

CM APPL. 20146/2019 (Condonation of delay in filing the restoration application)

1. The instant application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner/applicant seeking condonation of delay of 1880 days in filing the accompanying restoration application.

2. The captioned writ petition was filed against the impugned order dated 4th April 2001, passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court No. V, Room No. 54, Karkardooma Court, Delhi, whereby, the respondent has held that 17 workmen failed to prove that they had completed 240 days or more in the service of the management in one calendar year immediately Signature Not Verified CM APPL. 20146/2019 & CM APPL. 20145/2019 in W.P.(C) 6862/2002 Page 1 of 7 Digitally Signed By:SARIKA preceding the date of their termination and hence, they are not entitled for any relief.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant/petitioner submitted that the instant application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 1880 days in filing the accompanying restoration application.

4. It is submitted that the captioned writ petition bearing W.P(C) no.

6862/2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top