HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
RAJNISH BAHL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. A Petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed for quashing of Criminal Complaint No.614242 of 2016 pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Saket Court, New Delhi.
2. It is submitted in the Petition that on 13.01.1984, the legal heirs of Late Sh. K.L. Bahl arrived at a Family Settlement, whereby the house owned by Sh. K.L. Bahl bearing No. A-2, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi was given exclusively to Sh. Gulshan Bahl, one of the sons of Late Sh. K.L. Bahl in exchange of 950 shares of the family Company standing in the name of Sh. Gulshan Bahl, which were given to elder brother Sh. Manmohan Bahl/ Petitioner No.2. In January 1984 Sh. Gulshan Bahl acted upon the Family Settlement and was handed over the Jangpura property while he handed over the possession of 950 share to the Petitioner No.2.
3. On 04.02.1985 Sh. Gulshan Bahl passed away. In the year 2003 family members of Late Sh. Gulshan Bahl sold the house property and took the entire sale consideration without giving 1/4th share to their mother who was alive at that time. After his demise from February 1985 till September 2010 legal heirs of Sh. Gu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.