SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 1010

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SUNITA GUPTA & ORS. – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J:

I.A. 31197/2024 (under Section 151 CPC seeking a direction to the Receiver to release Rs. 76 lakhs to defendant no. 2 from the bank account of the partnership firm)

1. The captioned application has been filed by the defendant no. 2, son of late Sh. Gopal Krishan Gupta, who was the erstwhile partner of the Signature Not Verified Signed By:RASHMI CS(COMM) 607/2023 Page 1 of 11 partnership firm namely M/s Capital Metal industries. defendant no. 2, seeking directions to the Court Receiver appointed vide Order date 21.12.2023 to repay the unsecured loan of Rs. 76 lakhs advanced by the applicant/defendant no. 2 to the partnership firm.

2. Dr. Amit George, the learned counsel for the applicant/defendant no. 2 submits that on account of death of late Sh. Gopal Krishan Gupta on 09.06.2022 the partnership firm stood dissolved, however, the plaintiff who is the surviving partner of the firm continued the operations of the firm on the pretext of winding up the partnership firm under Section 47 of the Indian Partnership Act 1932 (‘Act of 1932’) and during this period the plaintiff also cleared the debts of the partnership firm.

2.1 He stated that the un

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top