2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 18000
DELHI HIGH COURT
JAI PRAKASH SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
CRL.M.C.-2704/2023
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2659
Page 1 of 4
$~66
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CRL.M.C. 2704/2023, CRL.M.A. 10176/2023
JAI PRAKASH SINGHAL
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Tanmay Mehta with Mr, Lalit
Valesha, Advs.
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC with Mr.
Akhand Pratap, SPP, MR. Amit
Peswani, Advs. for State with ACP
Virender Kadyan and Insp. Pradeep
Rai, Section-1, E.O.W.
%
Date of Decision: 18th April, 2023
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
J U D G M E N T
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)
CRL.M.A. 10177/2023 (exemption )
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 2704/2023
1.The present petition has been filed seeking following prayer:
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:20.04.2023
13:19:39
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2659
Page 2 of 4
kindly be granted in favour of the applicant.”
2.However, Mr. Tanmay Mehta, learned counsel submits that he does
not want to press his prayers made in the present petition for the time
being subject to raising the said plea at an appropriate time. However,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated
10.04.2023, learned Special Judge was pleased to recall the
proceedings under Section 82 Cr. P.C. with the directions to the
accused to appear and join the investigation from 10.04.2023.
3.Learned counsel submits that immediately thereafter, he moved an
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:20.04.2023
13:19:39
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2659
Page 3 of 4
application for anticipatory bail on 13.04.2023 which is now listed on
20.04.2023.
4.Learned counsel submits that if the learned Special Judge hears and
decides the application for anticipatory bail on 20.04.2023, he will
have no difficulty but in case, the application for anticipatory bail is
adjourned for one reason or the other, his client will become
remediless as in terms of the order dated 10.04.2023. He will have no
legal remedy.
5. Ms. Nandita Rao, learned ASC has opposed the prayer on the ground
that in fact in the garb of this prayer, petitioner is seeking anticipatory
bail/interim protection which is not being granted by the learned
Special Judge.
6.I consider that without going into all the merits of the case, let the
petitioner in terms of order dated 10.04.2023 of learned Special
Judge join the investigation as and when directed by the Special
Cell/EOW, However, if the learned Special Judge shall decide the
application on 20.04.2023, no orders are required to be passed. In
case, the application is not decided on 20.04.2023, the 10 days time
granted vide order dated 10.04.2023 shall stand further extended by
another 10 days.
7.This Court requests the learned Trial Court to decide the application
on 20.04.2023 or as expeditiously as possible.
8. The period of 10 days is extended for further 10 days. The petition
along with pending application stands disposed of with the liberty to
take appropriate legal proceedings in accordance with law.
9.It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:20.04.2023
13:19:39
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2659
Page 4 of 4
and the parties may take their pleas at an appropriate stage.
10.Order dasti.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
APRIL 18, 2023
Digitally Signed By:RAJ
BALA
Signing Date:20.04.2023
13:19:39
Signature Not Verified