SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3255

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SURESH CHAND SANKHLA – Appellant
Versus
D.T.T.D.C. & ORS – Respondent


O R D E R

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral)

1. The instant writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking following reliefs:-

"a. Calling for the records of the case from the respondent corporation;

b. Calling for the records of the proceedings against respondent No.3, 4 and 5;

c. Quash the departmental proceedings held ex-parte against the petitioner;

d. Quash the impugned order dated 30.11.2007 dismissing the petitioner from service;

e. Direct the respondent No.1 to reinstate the petitioner in service with full benefits;

f. Direct initiation of criminal case and departmental proceedings against respondents No.3, 4 and 5..."

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was appointed on the permanent post of Junior Salesman in the respondent No. l corporation on 19th August 1991 and had served the said corporation up to the date of his dismissal from service vide impugned order dated 30th November 2007. During his tenure of more than 16 years the petitioner was posted at Indian-Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL, in short) Shops situated at Chandni Chowk, Vishnu Garden, South Patel Nagar a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top