SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 4974

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL – Appellant
Versus
UOI & ORS – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

% 04.11.2022

1. Are philatelic exhibits ―antiquities‖ within the meaning of the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972? The parties before me have joined issue on this query which, therefore, this judgement attempts to answer.

Facts

2. The petitioner is a philatelist.

3. The philatelic materials which interest the petitioner include postage and fiscal stamps, envelopes, stamp papers and other such documents which, as per Mr. Sunil Mittal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, may be of more than a century‘s vintage. The petitioner claims to own various philatelic collections and has, by way of examples, referred to exhibits, exhibited by the petitioner at various philatelic exhibitions, relating to the ancient postal system of the Indore Princely Estate, fiscals of the Indore Princely Estate, fiscals of the Kishangarh Princely State and fiscals of Khairagarh Princely State, among others. The petitioner is a member of the Philatelic Congress of India (PCI) which, as per the petition, is the apex body of philatelists in the country. The PCI, in turn, is a member of the Federation of International Asian Philately (FIAP) and the Federation of International Philately (FIP). T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top