HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA, J
NAKUL – Appellant
Versus
USHA INTERNATIONAL LTD – Respondent
1. Witten statement and reply to I.A. 5968/2024 , have been filed by the defendant, in CS(COMM) 225/2024.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that he needs some more time to file replication to the written statement filed on behalf of the defendant.
3. Let the replication be filed within the statutory period.
4. A counter claim has been filed in CS(COMM) 226/2024 , on behalf of the defendant, under Section 64 of The Patents Act, 1970 , for revocation of Indian Patent No. 319855, registered in favour of the plaintiff.
5. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff.
6. Let reply be filed within a period of four weeks.
7. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within four weeks, thereafter.
8. The present application has been filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure (“CPC”), 1908 on behalf of the defendant seeking permission to file a Pen Drive in the present suit.
I.A. 34057/2024 (Application for seeking permission to file a pen drive) 9. The defendant, by way of the present application, seeks leave to file prior art in the form of a pen drive in the present suit.
10. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.