IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
PIYUSH AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
ORDER
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 3256/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 350/2024 & CRL.M.A. 3257/2024
1. Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 02.11.2023 passed by learned ASJ/SPL. FTC in SC No.126/2022 whereby the application filed on behalf of the petitioner for further investigation in FIR No.127/2021 under section 376 IPC registered at PS: Connaught Place has been dismissed.
2. Issue notice. Learned ASC for the respondent/State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.
3. In brief, as per the facts noticed in the impugned order, the petitioner came in contact with prosecutrix through a ‘Dating App’ and both started communicating with each other. Eventually, both of them entered into sexual relationship, which the prosecutrix alleged to be on ‘promise of marriage’ by the petitioner. Prosecutrix further alleged that she got pregnant and thereafter the petitioner blocked her mobile number and also allegations of abuse and criminal intimi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.