Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA, MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR, JJ
ARPITA AGRO PRODUCTS PVT LTD & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
ITC LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed under commercial courts act (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's claims regarding trademarks (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. appellants' defense against infringement (Para 5) |
| 4. court's view on prior business dealings (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. court's reasoning on deceptive similarity (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 6. court's dismissal of the appeal (Para 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(A) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, „CPC‟), challenging the Order dated 08.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A. 19464/2023 and I.A.21893/2023 in CS (COMM) 698/2023, titled ITC Limited v. Arpita Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (hereinafter referred to as, „Impugned Order‟).
BRIEF FACTS: -
A. The appellants nos. 1 to 3 were engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling herbal floor cleaners under the trademark „NIMYLE‟ and other trademarks from the „NIM‟ fa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
