2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 827
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment reserved on:11th December, 2023
Judgment delivered on: 19th January, 2024
+
CRL.M.C. 4528/2023
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr.Satish
Aggarwala,
Senior
Standing
Counsel
and
Mr.Anurag
Ojha, Senior Standing Counsel with
Mr.Gagan Vaswani, Advocate.
versus
JITENDER KUMAR
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Mr.Vijay Kasana,
Mr.Kshitij Chhabra and Mr.Chirag
Verma, Advocates.
+
CRL.M.C. 4529/2023 & CRL.M.A. 17313/2023 (stay)
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr.Satish
Aggarwala,
Senior
Standing
Counsel
and
Mr.Anurag
Ojha, Senior Standing Counsel with
Mr.Gagan Vaswani, Advocate.
versus
JITENDER KUMAR
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Mr.Vijay Kasana,
Mr.Kshitij Chhabra and Mr.Chirag
Verma, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
JUDGEMENT
1.CRL.M.C.4529/2023 has been filed by the petitioner Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) seeking setting aside of the order dated 2nd February, 2023, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, granting anticipatory bail to the respondent accused Jitender Kumar.
2.CRL.M.C.4528/2023 has been filed by the petitioner DGGI seeking setting aside of the order dated 24th April, 2023, whereby the learned ASJ has dismissed the petition filed on behalf of the DGGI seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent on 2nd February, 2023.
3.Brief facts, as agitated by the DGGI, are as follows:
3.1The officers of DRI Gandhidham and DGGI, acting on intelligence, intercepted 21 containers carrying smoking mixtures from Mundra Port, Gujarat on 3rd October, 2022. The samples taken therefrom were sent to the Central Revenues Control Laboratory (CRCL), Kandla, wherein it was revealed that the aforesaid smoking mixture was a spurious product and not fit for human consumption.
3.2Investigation was started and summons were issued to the exporter company, M/s Harsha International. However, the proprietor of M/s Harsha International, the present respondent, Jitender Kumar, did not comply with the aforesaid summons.
3.3During search of the registered premises of M/s Harsha International, it was revealed that no business activity relating to export was being carried out and a kirana store was being operated by the father of Jitender Kumar, from the registered place of business.
3.4During the course of investigation, it was found that M/s Radiant Traders, the manufacturers of smoking mixtures, had supplied the smoking mixture to M/s Harsha International. Upon search, it was found that no business activity was being conducted from the registered premises of M/s Radiant Traders and no goods or plant or machinery was found at their premises.
3.5Subsequently, statement of the proprietor of M/s Radiant Traders, Manish Goyal, was recorded under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act), wherein he stated that no smoking mixtures have been supplied by his firm to M/s Harsha International.
3.6The co-accused Manish Goyal was arrested on 25th November, 2022 under the allegations of having committed offences under Section 132(1)(b) and (c) of the CGST Act.
3.7The co-accused Manish Goyal preferred a bail application before the learned ASJ, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, which was allowed vide order dated 21st December, 2022 and he was released on regular bail.
3.8Jitender Kumar preferred an anticipatory bail before the learned ASJ, which was granted vide order dated 2nd February, 2023.
3.9The DGGI moved an application before the Sessions Court, seeking cancellation of the aforesaid anticipatory bail on the grounds of violation of the conditions mentioned therein, which was dismissed by the learned ASJ vide order dated 24th April, 2023.
4.Senior Standing Counsels appearing on behalf of the DGGI have made the following submissions:
- I.The Sessions Court could not have granted anticipatory bail to Jitender Kumar in view of the recent order dated 17th July, 2023 passed by the Supreme Court in SLP (Crl.) No. 4212-
4213 of 2019 titled State of Gujarat v. Choodamani Parmeshwaran Iyer, wherein it was observed that provisions of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) are not applicable to cases involving offences under the CGST Act. II.Jitender Kumar is involved in a serious economic offence relating to evasion of Goods and Services Tax (GST) to the tune of Rs.218 crores. III.In the present case, Input Tax Credit has been shown to be received on the basis of procurement of cigarettes which have been shown to be used as raw material to manufacture smoking mixture. It is pertinent to note that the prices of cigarettes are very high when compared to loose tobacco. Therefore, the aforesaid method is neither economically viable nor technically feasible and