SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 16605

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAMESH CHANDRA AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
SH. NAVNEET KUMAR SUREKHA AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
SANJAY MANCHANDA

O R D E R

% 12.09.2024 I.A. 39242/2024 (exemption from filing the original/certified copies and typed copies of the dim documents)

1. Plaintiff shall file legible and clearer copies of exempted documents, compliant with practice rules, before the next date of hearing.

2. The application for exemption is allowed, subject to the plaintiff granting inspection of the documents filed, as and when required to do so, or filing the original documents at the stage of admission/denial.

3. The application stands disposed of.

CS(OS) 734/2024

4. In the plaint, it has been averred by the plaintiff that a sum of Rs. 2 crores was returned to defendant no.2 by way of Real Time Gross Settlement (‘RTGS’) through banking channels. However, documents in support of the said banking transaction have not been placed on record by the plaintiff.

CS(OS) 734/2024 Page 1 of 3

4.1. Learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the said document will be placed on record within a period of one week.

5. The present suit has been filed for seeking cancellation of the sale deeds executed by the plaintiff in favour of defendant no.2 on 05th March, 2011. Upon perusal of plaint, this Court finds that the plaint fails to disclos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top