SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 29843

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Dharmesh Sharma, J
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
RAJ BALA & ORS. – Respondent
MAC.APP. 200/2024



Advocates:
RAVI SABHARWAL

The court allowed the condonation of delay in filing the appeal and stayed the MACT award pending deposit of compensation, emphasizing the need for deeper examination of contributory negligence and financial dependency of legal heirs.

Headnote:(A) Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Act - Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The appellant sought to condone a delay of 9 days in filing the appeal against the MACT judgment dated 20.12.2023, which was allowed. The appellant contended that the deceased was not wearing a helmet and was guilty of contributory negligence, as supported by the Post Mortem Report. (Paras 3, 8, 9)

(B) Appeal - The court stayed the operation of the impugned judgment-cum-award, requiring the appellant to deposit the entire compensation amount with interest. The court noted that the deceased left behind legal heirs who were not financially dependent, questioning the Tribunal's deduction for personal expenses. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The appeal was filed by the Insurance Company against the MACT award, with the deceased involved in a head-on collision while riding a scooter without a helmet. The deceased left behind a widow, mother, and adult children.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the delay in filing the appeal and stayed the operation of the MACT award pending deposit of compensation.

Issues: The main issues included the deceased's contributory negligence and the appropriateness of the Tribunal's deduction for personal expenses.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for deeper examination of the issues raised regarding contributory negligence and the financial dependency of the legal heirs.

Result: Delay condoned; operation of the MACT award stayed.

ORDER

% 15.04.2024 CM APPL. 21823/2024 (Ex.)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

 

2. The application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 21824/2024 (Delay of 09 days in filing the present appeal)

3. This application has been moved on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 09 days in filing the present appeal.

 

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 09 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.

 

5. The application stands disposed of.

MAC.APP. 200/2024 and CM APPL. 21822/2024 (Stay)

6. The appellant/Insurance Company is assailing the impugned judgment-cum-award dated 20.12.2023 passed by the Presiding Officer, MACT-01, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.

 

7. None appeared on behalf of the respondents, despite advance notice.

 

8. Learned counsel for the appellant has urged that the deceased, who was riding a scooter was not wearing a helmet at the time of the accident, support is invited from the Post Mortem Report wherein the skull of the deceased was found fractured. Further, it is pointed out that the accident was a head-on collision with the truck. It is also submitted that the deceased was guilty of contributory negligence.

Reliance has been placed on the decision in Bijoy Kumar Dugar v. Bidyadhar Dutta & Ors. in Appeal (Civil) 3731-3732 of 2002.

9. It is urged that the deceased left behind his mother, wife and other legal heirs i.e., children who are all major and are not financially dependent upon the deceased, yet the learned Tribunal has made a deduction of 1/4th towards personal and living expenses.

 

10. The issue raised by the learned counsel for the appellant requires deeper examination.

 

11. The operation of the impugned judgment-cum-award dated 20.12.2023 is hereby stayed, subject to the appellant/Insurance Company depositing the entire amount of compensation along with accrued interest with the learned Tribunal, within four weeks from today. On such deposit, 50% of the amount of compensation be released to respondent No. 1/widow and respondent No.8/mother in terms of the directions passed by the learned Tribunal.

 

12. Let notice be issued to the respondents by all permissible modes including via approved courier as well. Since the main contest is between the appellant/Insurance company and the claimants, service of the present appeal upon respondents No. 9 and 10, who are the driver and registered owner of the offending vehicle respectively, is dispensed with.

 

13. Let digitized Trial Court Record (TCR) be requisitioned for the next date of hearing.

 

14. Matter be placed before the Joint Registrar (Judicial) on 28.05.2024 for completion of service and completion of pleadings.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top