O R D E R

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner, vide the instant writ petition seeks to challenge the impugned orders dated 06.03.2019 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (hereinafter referred as to „concerned authority‟), whereby, the claim of the respondents has been allowed with respect to difference of minimum wages. Vide order dated 06.09.2019, the review application filed by the petitioner has also been rejected.

2. A perusal of the impugned order dated 06.03.2019 would indicate that there were four applications filed under Section 20(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the „Act of 1948‟) by the respective workman and the same were registered as Case No.30, 31, 32 and

92 of 2018.

3. The petitioner, vide the instant writ petition seeks to challenge the impugned award with respect to all four workmen.

4. It is to be noted that the petitioner was required to file four separate writ petitions. Since, the same has not been done, therefore, the challenge to the award passed with respect to three cases, cannot be considered in the instant writ petition and instead, the instant writ petition is treated to have been filed only with respect