2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 17439
$~35
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(C) 2559/2022 & CM APPL.7328/2022
SMT. BIRINDER KAUR
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Zubeda Begum & Mr. Zubin
Sengh, Advocates (M-9868119078)
versus
SHRI BALTEJ SINGH SRA & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Ashok Chhabra, Advocate for R-
1 (M-9810008481)
Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Advocate for
GNCTD.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
ZUBEDA BEGUM
A person must be a citizen of India to be considered a "senior citizen" under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
Headnote:
MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007 - CITIZENSHIP - SENIOR CITIZEN - OCI CARD HOLDER - PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a US citizen and OCI card holder, filed a complaint under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, seeking maintenance from her son. The Tribunal dismissed the complaint as non-maintainable, holding that the petitioner was not a citizen of India and therefore not a "senior citizen" within the meaning of the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the petitioner was a US citizen and not a citizen of India, and therefore did not meet the definition of "senior citizen" under Section 2(h) of the Act. The court also noted that the petitioner was not the legal parent of the respondent, as she had stated in her application that the respondent was her brother in the eyes of the law after adoption.
Issues: Whether a senior person above the age of 60 years who holds an OCI card and owns property in India can maintain a petition under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner was not a "senior citizen" within the meaning of the Act because she was not a citizen of India. The court also held that the petitioner was not the legal parent of the respondent, and therefore could not maintain a petition under the Act.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition as non-maintainable.
%
11.01.2023
1.
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2.
None appears for the GNCTD.
3.
The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Smt. Birinder
Kaur seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 14th November 2021
passed by the Ld. Tribunal of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and
Senior Citizens. By the said order, the ld. Tribunal had dismissed the
complaint filed by the Petitioner as non-maintainable in light of the fact that
the Petitioner was a citizen of the USA and not a citizen of India. The order
passed by the Ld. Tribunal is on the strength of Section 2(h) of the
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. Section
2(h) of the said act reads as:
(h) "senior citizen" means any person being a citizen of
India, who has attained the age of sixty years or above
4.
The relevant portion of the order passed by the ld. Tribunal is
extracted below:
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2024 at 11:35:04
The main question which has to be answered in
this application is whether applicant is covered within
the definition of parent as defined in Section 2(d) or
covered within the definition of senior citizen as defined
in Section 2 (h) of the Act.
Even though, the applicant counsel argued that
the applicant is a biological mother of the respondent;
the applicant herself in her application dated 25.10.2019
filed before this tribunal stated that “the respondent who
is biological son, however is brother to her in the eyes of
law, after adoption”. Hence, it is clear that the legal
relationship between the applicant and respondent is that
of brother and sister not of mother and son. Hence, the
applicant is not the legal parent of the respondent and
not covered within the
definition under Section 2 (d) of the Act.
It is also proved that the applicant is a US citizen and
not a citizen of India. As per Section 2 (h); senior citizen
means any person being a citizen of India, who has
attained the age of 60 years or above. Admittedly, the
applicant is not a citizen of India at the time of filling
application. Hence, the applicant is not covered within
the definition of senior citizen as defined under Section 2
(h) of the Act.
In view of the above facts; the application is
dismissed as non maintainable.
5.
The present petition raises an important issue as to whether a senior
person above the age of 60 years who holds an OCI card and owns property
in India can maintain a petition under the Maintenance and Welfare of
Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
6.
All parties to file written submissions and judgment which they rely
upon at least one week before the next date of hearing.
7.
List for hearing on 19th July, 2023.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
JANUARY 11, 2023/Rahul/AM
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2024 at 11:35:04