SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 8015

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JANKI PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SANJEEV KHIRWAR (PRINCIPAL SECRETARY) STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

MINI PUSHKARNA, J: (ORAL)

1. The present contempt petition had been filed alleging non-compliance of the order dated 22nd March, 2022 passed by Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 4559/2022.

2. By way of the aforesaid writ petition, the petitioner had challenged the award of contract arising out of Notice Inviting Tender (“NIT”) dated CONT.CAS(C) 537/2022 Page 2 of 4 21st June, 2021 with respect to allotment of swimming pools. The contention of the petitioner was that the contract relating to work of operation and maintenance of 12 swimming pools under the jurisdiction of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), was tendered by way of the said NIT. The contention raised by the petitioner in the writ proceedings was that the 12 swimming pools were allotted by the MCD to 9 firms for their operation and maintenance on license fee of just Rs. 10,000/- to Rs. 15,000/- higher than the Minimum License Fee (“MLF”).

3. The said writ petition filed by the petitioner, was disposed of by the Division Bench of this Court by order dated 22nd March, 2022, in the following


      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top