SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 4636

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TATA SIA AIRLINES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VISTARA HOME APPLIANCES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

1. The present appeal is one whereby the appellant (original plaintiff) seeks to impugn the order dated 28th October, 2021 passed by the learned Trial Court1 dismissing its application under Order XXXIX rules 1 & 2 read with Section 1512 of The Code of Civil Procedure, 19083 in a suit for infringement of trademark, passing off and other ancillary reliefs against the respondents (original defendants).

1 Hereinafter referred as “impugned order

2 Hereinafter referred as “interim application

Henceforth referred as “CPC

CASE OF THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE LD. TRIAL COURT:

2. As per facts, appellant is a joint venture between TATA Sons Private Limited and Singapore Airlines Limited operating a full-fledged service airline under its trademark „VISTARA‟ covering as many as 36 destinations with over 200 flights a day on the date of institution of the suit before the learned Trial Court. The said trademark „VISTARA‟ of appellant, since its declaration as a „well-known trademark‟ as per Section 2(1)(zg)4 of The Trade Marks Act, 19995 by this Court in TATA SIA Airlines Limited v M/s. Pilot18 Aviation Book Store & Anr.6, is entitled to a higher degree of protection

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top