SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11993

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J
RACHITA FRANCIS XAVIER – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
W.P.(C) 1754/2020 & CM APPL. 6133/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Bharadwaj S. Iyengar, Mr. Vikas Upadhyay
For the Respondents: Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, Mr Abhigyan Siddhant

The court held that a minor born in India to parents who renounced Indian citizenship can seek citizenship through special provisions, emphasizing the right to nationality as a fundamental human right.

Headnote:(A) Citizenship Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 4, 5, and 2(1)(b) - Passports Act, 1967 - Section 6(2)(a) - Issuance of passport - The petitioner, born in India to parents who were once Indian citizens but became U.S. citizens, was denied a passport due to her parents’ citizenship status. The court found that the petitioner is not considered an illegal migrant and qualifies as a person of Indian origin under Section 5(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act. The court emphasized that under Section 5(4), the Central Government has the authority to grant citizenship in special circumstances. (Paras 26, 52, 56)

(B) The court recognized the petitioner's right to nationality in light of international human rights standards, emphasizing that denying her citizenship without just cause would infringe upon her fundamental rights. (Paras 44, 50, 56)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a 17-year-old girl born in India, sought a passport after her initial application was rejected on grounds of citizenship status due to her parents’ renunciation of Indian citizenship. (Paras 2-6)

Findings of Court:
The court directed the petitioner to apply for Indian citizenship under Section 5 of the Citizenship Act and upon approval, she was to apply for a passport, which must be granted swiftly. (Paras 56)

Issues: Whether the petitioner can be treated as a citizen for obtaining a passport; whether she is classified as an illegal migrant. (Paras 10, 28)

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner was deemed not to be an illegal migrant, qualifying instead as a person of Indian origin, and the Central Government was directed to exercise its powers to grant registration in light of special circumstances. (Paras 52-54)

Result: Writ petition allowed, permitting the petitioner to apply for citizenship and directing issuance of passport thereafter.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks passport due to parents' citizenship issues. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments against discrimination based on minor status. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. respondents claim non-eligibility under the passports act. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. court analyzes illegal migrant classification. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
5. overview of citizenship provisions under indian law. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
6. interplay between domestic law and international human rights. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50)
7. court recognizes special circumstances for citizenship. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)
8. court's directives on passport issuance process. (Para 56)
9. final ruling that the petition is allowed. (Para 57)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. This hearing has been held through hybrid mode.

Background

2. This writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner, Rachita Francis Xavier – a young girl who was born, raised and educated in India. She is now 17 years of age and has never held a passport. She was born to Indian parents who had acquired US citizenship. Her parents were in India when she was born, however, as neither of her parents were Indian citizens at the time of her birth, her application for issuance of a passport was rejected by Respondent No.3- Regional Passport Officer, Bengaluru, vide order dated 6th November 2019. The Petitioner seeks issuance of a passport and also seeks quashing of the office memorandum dated 25th October, 2018 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs, which was the basis for the rejection of her passport.

3. The Petitioner – Ms. Rachita Francis Xavier, who is a minor, was born on 7th November, 2006 to Mr. Joseph Francis Xavier – father and Ms. Leela Francis Xavier– mother in Andhra Pradesh, India. Both her parents were earlier Indian citizens. However, her father acquired citizenship of the United States of America (USA) on 28th September, 2001. Similarly, her mother acquired citizenship of the USA on 28th July, 2005. Thus, on the date she was born in India, both her parents were not Indian citizens. However, they had been granted the status of Overseas Citizens of India in June, 2006 and were OCI card holders.

4. The Petitioner pursued her education at St. Michaels’ High School, Bengaluru under the ICSE Board. However, she has currently discontinued her schooling after 9th Standard. She is stated to be taking courses with Kenpro Learning and submitted before the Court that she is interested in taking up web designing and web development courses as also some advanced computer courses abroad. For the said purposes, she requires a passport as the minimum travel document. She does not possess any travel documents and has therefore, remained in India since birth.

5. In this background, on 30th September, 2019, the Petitioner submitted her application for issuance of a passport to enable her to travel abroad. The parents of the Petitioner also submitted all the necessary forms for the said purpose. The Petitioner also has an Aadhaar card which was issued to her. The Regional Passport Office, Bengaluru on 6th November, 2019, refused to issue her passport by citing Section 6 (2)(a) read with Section 5 (2)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967 . The said order records that both parents had renounced Indian citizenship and in view of the Ministry’s circular dated 25th October, 2018, the Petitioner is not entitled to be recognized as an Indian citizen. Various RTI applications were filed by the Petitioner. The Office Memorandum dated 25th October, 2018, bearing No. V1/401/1/1/2018, issued by the Chief Passport Officer, PSP Division, Ministry of External Affairs, India has been relied upon by the Petitioner, as per which, a child born in India does not acquire Indian citizenship automatically by birth until the conditions laid down in the Citizenship Act, 1955 read with Citizenship Amendment Act, 2003 are satisfied. The said Office Memorandum i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top