SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3100

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BALDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEVI LAL GARG – Respondent


Advocates:
SHEKHAR NANAVATY

ORDER

% 15.07.2024 CM APPL. 39270/2024 [Exemption from filing clear, dim, underlined, typed and original copies of the annexures]

1. Allowed, subject to the Appellant filing legible/typed copies of the annexures within four weeks.

CM APPL. 39271/2024 [Exemption from filing certified copies of annexures]

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 39272/2024 [Exemption from filing the TCR]

3. For the reasons stated in the Application, the prayer made in the Application is allowed.

4. Registry is directed to place on record the digital copy of the Trial Court Record duly paginated and bookmarked in accordance with the rules of the High Court.

RFA 428/2024 & CM APPL. 39269/2024 [Stay]

5. The present Petition impugns the order dated 07.05.2024 passed by the learned District Judge-10, Central, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Judgment’], wherein the learned Trial Court decreed the suit of specific performance filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff and directed the Respondent/Plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration in the sum of Rs. 48,000/- within 90 days from the date of Judgment.

6. Learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top