HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR, JJ
SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV @ RANJAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
1. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assailing the Order dated 27.09.2017 passed by the respondent no.2, which upheld the Order dated 15.12.2014 passed by the respondent no.4, whereby the services of the petitioner were terminated on the ground of the petitioner furnishing false information against question nos. 12 (a), (b) and (c) of the Attestation Form (Verification Roll) at the time of his enrolment into service.
2. We may note herein the brief facts of the case.
3. The petitioner successfully qualified the open competitive examination conducted by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) and was offered the post of Constable (General Duty) in the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) vide Memorandum No. 2/31/12/SSB(SSC)/Rectt. CT(GD)/ Pers-II/5700-5702 dated 04.03.2013. He was directed to report to the Commandant, Recruit Training Centre (RTC), SSB, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh on or before 02.04.2013.
4. While joining the service, the petitioner accepted the terms and conditions specified in paragraph 2(xi) of the offer of appointment, which was issued to him through the aforesaid Memorandum. According to the te
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.