SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 2129

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PRAKASH JARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

1. The present petition has been filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. for seeking bail in pursuance to FIR No.213/2020 dated 18.04.2020 registered at Police Station Neb Sarai for the offences punishable under sections

386/506/306/34 IPC.

2. Petitioner is sitting MLA from Deoli Assembly Constituency of NCT of Delhi. He remained in police custody in above-mentioned case since 09.05.2020 to 16.05.2020 but the IO himself filed an application for sending the Petitioner to JC and on 17.05.2020 the Petitioner was sent to JC as the investigation qua him had been completed.

3. Ms.Rebecca M. John, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in the FIR itself, it has been mentioned by the complainant that wife of deceased gave one complaint to the Delhi Jal Board on 09.04.2020 as DD No.5378, just one week before the suicide, against the Petitioner but contrary to said fact in the said complaint, name of the Petitioner as well as name of co-accused persons has not been mentioned. Further no allegations of extortion or threat has been made by wife of deceased in the said complaint. Moreover, the deceased or his family members were plying water tanker sinc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top