SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 1622

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
DHARANIDHAR KARIMOJJI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, C.J.

1. The Petitioner before this Court has filed this present Petition in public interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India stating that he holds a Bachelor of Technology Degree and is working as Freelancer in digital marketing.

2. The Petitioner has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ or direction directing the Respondents to regulate and control working of online digital lenders doing the business of lending through Mobile Applications or any other platform, as well as restraining them from charging exorbitant interest on loan from borrowers, to restrain the lenders from harassing the borrowers and to save the borrowers from recovery agents and to fix the maximum interest of rate chargeable by online digital lenders.

3. A prayer has also been made to set up Grievance Redressal Mechanism for borrowers in every State/ Union of India.

4. The Petitioner, as stated by him, is working as a Freelancer in Digital Marketing, and his contention is that online lending platforms are offering loan to the needy people through online applications (Apps). It has been stated that there are 300 instant personal loan Apps in Play-Store, and l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top