DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJEEV SHAH (DECEASED) THROUGH LR MS. GAYATRI SHAH – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-3502/2022
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2430
W.P.(C) 3502/2022
Page 1 of 19
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
W.P.(C) 3502/2022 & CM APPL. 10324/2022
RAJEEV SHAH (DECEASED) THROUGH LR MS.
GAYATRI SHAH
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Sr. Adv.
with Ms. Ruchira V. Arora,
Advocate (M:9810322797)
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
& ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Anupam Srivastava, ASC
for GNCTD with Mr. Dhairya
Gupta, Ms. Sarita Pandey, Mr.
Vasuh
Misra,
Mr.
Ujjwal
Malhotra, Advocates for R-1
and 2 (M:9811128170)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
J U D G M E N T
10.04.2023
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
1.
The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner raising
the plea that the proceeding in appeal bearing no. 70/2010, GS
Rajokri Vs Rajiv Shah (deceased) through LRs, filed by the
respondent no. 2 Gaon Sabha, Rajokri under Section 185 of the Delhi
Land Reforms Act, 1954 (DLR Act) against the order/judgment dated
26.05.2010 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Magistrate
(SDM)/Revenue Assistant (RA), cannot continue in view of
declaration of Village Rajokri, wherein the land in question is situated,
Digitally Signed By:PURAN
SINGH TARIYAL
Signing Date:10.04.2023
20:13:40
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2430
W.P.(C) 3502/2022
Page 2 of 19
as a Low Density Residential Area (LDRA) in urban extension.
2.
Proceedings under Section 81 of the DLR Act were initiated in
respect of the land of the petitioner and respondent no. 3, bearing
khasra nos. 549/1 Min (0-9), 548 Min (0-3/2), 553 Min (3-0) and
558/1 Min (0-12), situated in Village Rajokri, Tehsil Vasant Vihar,
New Delhi. The proceedings were initiated on the basis of report of
the Halka Patwari dated 02.01.2009, wherein it was reported that a
boundary wall is being raised and construction material is lying in
huge quantity. Thus, notice dated 23.01.2009 was issued by the
learned SDM/RA to late Sh. Rajiv Shah, father of the petitioner and
respondent no. 3, stating that the agricultural land was being used for
non-agricultural purposes by way of constructing boundary wall.
3.
Subsequently, on the basis of reply dated 17.05.2010 filed by
late Sh. Rajiv Shah, the learned SDM/RA dropped the proceedings
under Section 81 of the DLR Act. An appeal under Section 185 of the
DLR Act, along with an application for condonation of delay in filing
the appeal, was filed by the respondent no. 2-Gaon Sabha before the
Learned Deputy Commissioner, South West, Kapashera, New Delhi
on 13.10.2010, which was subsequently transferred to the Court of
Additional Deputy Magistrate (ADM), Jam Nagar House, New Delhi.
4.
During the pendency of the appeal, father of the petitioner
expired. Subsequently, upon the death of her mother, petitioner herein
filed an application for substitution under Order 22 Rule 4 of Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) on the basis of will dated 09.08.2016 in
her favour, which was allowed by the learned Deputy Commissioner
vide order dated 09.11.2017.
Digitally Signed By:PURAN
SINGH TARIYAL
Signing Date:10.04.2023
20:13:40
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2430
W.P.(C) 3502/2022
Page 3 of 19
5.
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has
challenged the pendency of the appeal filed by respondent no. 2 before
the Learned ADM, New Delhi.
6.
On behalf of the petitioner, it is contended that the proceedings
pending in the appeal before learned ADM are bad in law for want of
jurisdiction, in view of the fact that the DLR Act does not apply to the
land in question any more after the notification dated 18.06.2013
issued by the Minis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.