DELHI HIGH COURT
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES – Appellant
Versus
S.P. VASHISHT – Respondent
W.P.(C)-6525/2017
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:3620-DB
W.P.(C) 6525/2017 Page 1 of 23
#
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment reserved on: 18.04.2023
Judgment delivered on:25.05.2023
+
W.P.(C) 6525/2017
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Atul Kumar, Ms. Sweety Singh
and Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocates.
versus
S.P. VASHISHT
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Shanker Raju, Mr. Nilansh Gaur,
Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj and Mr. Rajesh
Sachdeva, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
J U D G M E N T
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
1. The challenge in this writ petition is to an order dated February 03,
2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to
as the „Tribunal‟) whereby the charge-sheet issued by the petitioner against
the respondent herein has been held to be void ab initio along with action
taken by the petitioner against the respondent on the charge-sheet, including
the inquiry report as well as the punishment order dated July 18, 2013
imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement. However, the petitioner has
been given liberty to initiate fresh disciplinary inquiry against the respondent
by following the procedure under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and in terms of
law laid down by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. B.V.
Gopinath, (2014) 1 SCC 351.
Digitally Signed
By:DINESH CHANDRA
Signing Date:25.05.2023
15:09:17
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:3620-DB
W.P.(C) 6525/2017 Page 2 of 23
2. (i) In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, Shri S.P. Vashisht
(respondent) was appointed to the post of Hawaldar in All India Institute of
Medical Sciences (AIIMS) on September 27, 1983 and subsequently
promoted to the post of Sanitary Officer. On the basis of a surprise check by
the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), ACB, New Delhi at the main
hospital store and C.N. Centre stores of AIIMS, an FIR was registered on
March 03, 1999 under Sections 120-B/420 IPC and Section 13 (2) read with
Section 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, for causing
undue pecuniary advantage to one Mr. Rajeev Rastogi of M/s Rajeev
Enterprises, by ignoring AIIMS rate contact with its approved suppliers.
Allegations also pertained to supply of surgical items by firms not having
license from the Drugs Controller, NTC, Delhi and supply of various sub-
standard items in the Hospital. DIG, CBI, ACB also forwarded a copy of the
report of S.P. CBI, ACB recommending for major penalty proceedings
against the erring officials of AIIMS on September 05, 2001.
(ii)
On October 17, 2001, a proposal for consideration of request of CBI,
ACB, New Delhi for (a) grant of sanction for prosecution, (b) initiation of
regular disciplinary proceedings for major penalty and (c) follow up
action/suspension subsequent to decision on (a) & (b) above, was placed
before the Governing Body of AIIMS, which authorised the President,
AIIMS to constitute a Committee to look into the matter and submit its
recommendations to the Governing Body.
(iii)
A two member Committee was accordingly constituted and
recommendations of Committee were submitted to the President AIIMS for
consideration. The report of the committee was further placed before the
Digitally Signed
By:DINESH CHANDRA
Signing Date:25.05.2023
15:09:17
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:3620-DB
W.P.(C) 6525/2017 Page 3 of 23
Governing body in its meeting held on April 03, 2002 which recommended
that in absence of material substance pertaining to any malafide intention on
the part of Dr. D.K. Sha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.