DELHI HIGH COURT
NILKAMAL CRATES AND CONTANERS & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MS. REENA RAJPAL & ANR. – Respondent
CS(COMM) 707/2023
Page 1 of 13
$~21
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CS(COMM) 707/2023
NILKAMAL CRATES AND CONTANERS & ANR.
..... Plaintiffs
Through:
Ms. Anju Agrawal, Dr. Mohan
Dewan, Mr. Rahul Maratha, Mr. D. Pawar,
Mr. B. Ghosh, Mr. Vardhman Jain and Mr.
M.K. Bhargava, Advs.
versus
MS. REENA RAJPAL & ANR.
..... Defendants
Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Sreejan
Pankaj and Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
J U D G M E N T (O R A L)
%
06.11.2023
I.A. 19600/2023 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC)
1.
Plaintiff 1 is the proprietor of various trademarks, registered
under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, of which, for the purposes of the
dispute at hand, one need only refer to the word mark NILKAMAL,
registered w.e.f. 22 January 1999 and the device marks
registered w.e.f. 6 December 2010 and
registered w.e.f. 9
May 1996. Vide License Agreement dated 1 September 1998 Plaintiff
1 authorised Plaintiff 2 to manufacture, package, supply and render
services of goods as mentioned in Schedule 1 of the license
Digitally Signed
By:HARIOM
Signing Date:07.11.2023
13:33:55
Signature Not Verified
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.