SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 12300

DELHI HIGH COURT
NILKAMAL CRATES AND CONTANERS & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MS. REENA RAJPAL & ANR. – Respondent


CS(COMM) 707/2023

Page 1 of 13

$~21

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CS(COMM) 707/2023

NILKAMAL CRATES AND CONTANERS & ANR.

..... Plaintiffs

Through:

Ms. Anju Agrawal, Dr. Mohan

Dewan, Mr. Rahul Maratha, Mr. D. Pawar,

Mr. B. Ghosh, Mr. Vardhman Jain and Mr.

M.K. Bhargava, Advs.

versus

MS. REENA RAJPAL & ANR.

..... Defendants

Through:

Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Sreejan

Pankaj and Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

J U D G M E N T (O R A L)

%

06.11.2023

I.A. 19600/2023 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC)

1.

Plaintiff 1 is the proprietor of various trademarks, registered

under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, of which, for the purposes of the

dispute at hand, one need only refer to the word mark NILKAMAL,

registered w.e.f. 22 January 1999 and the device marks

registered w.e.f. 6 December 2010 and

registered w.e.f. 9

May 1996. Vide License Agreement dated 1 September 1998 Plaintiff

1 authorised Plaintiff 2 to manufacture, package, supply and render

services of goods as mentioned in Schedule 1 of the license

Digitally Signed

By:HARIOM

Signing Date:07.11.2023

13:33:55

Signature Not Verified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top