SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 5458

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AJAY KUMAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J. (ORAL)

CM APPL. 48870/2022

1. By way of the present application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, the appellants/claimants seek condonation of delay of 378 days in filing the present appeal.

2. Mr. Rajan Sood, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants are sons of Sh. Hira Lal (the deceased), who unfortunately passed away in an ‘untoward incident’ on 13.07.2019. It is stated that though the impugned order was passed on 19.07.2021, however a certified copy of the same was received by the appellants only on 31.07.2021. He further submits that the appellants are poor persons and could not seek appropriate legal advice timely for want of funds. In support of his submissions, he has placed reliance on the following decisions, firstly, a decision passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Mohsina & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. reported as 2017 SCC OnLine Del 10003; a decision of the Gujarat High Court in Wasim Shamshulhak Shaikh v. Union of India reported as 2018 SCC OnLine Guj 3330; and lastly, a decision of the Bombay High Court in Smt. Kokilabai wd/o Shankarrao Choudhari v. Uni

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top