SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 28438

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
MOBELCHEM SPECIALTY PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates:
RAHUL CHAUDHRY

ORDER

% 19.02.2024 I.A. 3911/2024 (under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 of CPC for amendment of plaint)

1. Issue notice. Ms. Anju Agarwal, counsel for Defendant, accepts notice.

2. Ms. Agarwal states that she would like to file a reply to the present application, however, in the opinion of the Court, considering the technical nature of the amendments sought to be made through the present application, no reply is necessary. Accordingly, the Court has proceeded to hear the counsel for parties on the proposed amendments.

3. Mr. Nikhil Sharma, counsel for Plaintiff, states that on account of an inadvertent error on at the time of filing the plaint, the sales figures mentioned at Paragraphs No. 9 and 10 of the plaint are incorrect. Accordingly, he submits the amendments sought to be introduced by way of the instant application only seek to include the correct sales figures, which are purported to be in accordance with the figures mentioned in the affidavit dated 26th September, 2023.

4. Ms. Agarwal argues that these sales figures have been available with the Plaintiff from before filing of the plaint, yet incorrect figures were included in the original plaint. Moreo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top