SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 28767

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJIV SHAKDHER, AMIT BANSAL, JJ
SHIKHA LALL – Appellant
Versus
PRINCE AGARWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
ADAB SINGH KAPOOR

ORDER

% 03.04.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

 

1. Report of the registry shows that the respondent has been served via email.

 

2. Respondent has joined the proceedings through video conferencing upon service being effected.

 

3. This appeal is directed against order dated 13.02.2024 passed by the Family Court.

3.1. Via the said impugned order, the appellant is denied maintenance.

 

4. Counsel for the appellant and the respondent are given liberty to file their respective written submissions, not exceeding three pages each, at least five days before the next date of hearing.

 

5. The respondent will ensure that he engages a lawyer before the next date of hearing and if necessary, take his help in filing the written submissions.

 

6. It is made clear that if the requisite steps are not taken, the appeal will proceed on the basis of the record available with the court.

 

7. List the matter on 15.07.2024. 

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top