Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, JJ
TAPSI VIDYARTHI – Appellant
Versus
ARVIND KUMAR SINGH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage details and initial conflicts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of cruelty and domestic violence. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. appellant's defense against allegations. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence and behavior. (Para 15 , 18 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. legal standards for mental cruelty. (Para 39 , 46 , 51) |
| 6. court's ruling on the appeal. (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
JUDGMENT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J.
1. The appellant-wife, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 31.05.2023 whereby the learned Judge, Family Court has dissolved the marriage between the parties on the ground of Cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1955”), has filed the present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Act, 1955.
2. The parties got married on 18.04.2012 as per Hindu rites and customs and one child, Om was born from their wedlock on 29.11.2013. The respondent/husband asserted that few days after the marriage, the appellant started bickering over petty issues and arguing with him that she be allowed to keep her jewellery even though she has been advised otherwise. While they went on Hone
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
