SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 684

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SONNY SARNA & ANR – Appellant
Versus
URMIL WADHAWAN & ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
SANJEEV SINDHWANI

%

03.01.2024

I.A.19290/2022 (under Order XIV Rule 5 read with Section 151 CPC on

behalf of defendant No.1 and 2 seeking Modification of Issues) and I.A.

16375/2013 (under Order XII Rule 6 CPC on behalf of plaintiffs)

1.

It is submitted in the application I.A. 19290/2022 that the issues were

framed in this case vide Order dated 15.01.2019. Issue No.1, 2 and 3 have

been framed correctly.

2.

Learned Senior Advocate on behalf of the defendants submits that he

does not want any amendments in Issue No.4, though had requested it in the

application.

3.

Learned Sr. Advocate for the defendants submits that Issue No.5

which reads as “Whether plaintiff no. 1 ever conveyed title of any portion of

the suit property in favour of the defendant no.l? If so, when and how?

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/01/2024 at 18:12:33

OPD”, be deleted.

4.

Learned counsel for plaintiff submits that Issue No.5 was framed on

the specific plea of defendant No.1 and 2 in the Written Statement, but he

has no objection if the same is deleted.

5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top