SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 19570

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
BABITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
SURRENDER SINGH LAKRA – Respondent


Advocates:
RAKESH MAHAJAN

ORDER

% 09.04.2024 CRL.M.A.10868/2024 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.A. /2024 (to be numbered) Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for condonation of delay of 10 days in re-filing the petition.

For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 10 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

CRL.M.A. 10869/2024 Application under Section 5 of Limitation Act read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the petition.

For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 15 days in filing the petition is condoned.

Application is accordingly disposed of.

CRL.L.P. 186/2024 Criminal appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) along with application under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C. has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner against the judgment dated 11.12.2023 passed by learned MM-03, Patiala House Courts,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top