SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 21004

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
XYZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
ROHIT SHARMA

ORDER

1. By way of present application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C ., the petitioner/applicant seeks early hearing of the petition.

2. Issue notice.

3. Learned APP for the State accepts notice.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

5. The application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 7318/2023 and CRL.M.A. 14341/2024

1. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing today itself.

2. With the assistance of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State, I have gone through the petition.

3. By way of present petition filed under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C ., the petitioner seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 20.04.2023 passed by learned ASJ (Special Electricity Court), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in FIR No.15/2023 registered under Sections 498A/406/377/354/506/34 IPC at P.S. CAW Cell, Nanakpura.

4. The only ground for challenge to the grant of bail is that despite having admitted to be in possession of certain stridhan articles and undertaking to return them, the same have not been returned by respondent No.2.

5. On a query, learned APP for the State submits that the said statement w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top