SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 7957

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SUSHILA – Appellant
Versus
JOGINDER – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

1. The present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 read with Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the appellant-wife (respondent in the divorce petition hereinafter referred to as „appellant-wife‟) challenging the Judgment dated 30.07.2018 granting divorce on the ground of ‘Cruelty’ under Section 13(1)(ia) the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1955”) to the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as „respondent-

husband‟).

2. The facts in brief are that the parties got married on 03.12.2003 according to Hindu customs and rites and no child was born from the said wedlock. The respondent-husband asserted that their marriage was simple and dowryless. The appellant-wife came to reside in the matrimonial home on 04.12.2003 but merely two days after the marriage, she started complaining that she felt suffocated in the joint family which comprised of respondent-husband, his parents and brother. She insisted that separate residence from the family members be set up. She also insisted to take premises at Mia Wali Peera Garhi, New Delhi where her brother-in-law Mr.Devender was residing. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top