HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SUSHILA – Appellant
Versus
JOGINDER – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
1. The present Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 read with Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the appellant-wife (respondent in the divorce petition hereinafter referred to as „appellant-wife‟) challenging the Judgment dated 30.07.2018 granting divorce on the ground of ‘Cruelty’ under Section 13(1)(ia) the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act, 1955”) to the petitioner (hereinafter referred to as „respondent-
husband‟).
2. The facts in brief are that the parties got married on 03.12.2003 according to Hindu customs and rites and no child was born from the said wedlock. The respondent-husband asserted that their marriage was simple and dowryless. The appellant-wife came to reside in the matrimonial home on 04.12.2003 but merely two days after the marriage, she started complaining that she felt suffocated in the joint family which comprised of respondent-husband, his parents and brother. She insisted that separate residence from the family members be set up. She also insisted to take premises at Mia Wali Peera Garhi, New Delhi where her brother-in-law Mr.Devender was residing. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.