2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11500
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRANAV ANSAL – Appellant
Versus
VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR. – Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM)-290/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment delivered on: May 23, 2023
+ O.M.P. (COMM) 290/2019, I.As. 10329/2019 & 15542/2019
PRANAV ANSAL
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Ashwini Kumar Mata, Sr.
Adv. with Mr. Sujoy Datta,
Ms. Nishtha Khurana,
Ms. Mahima Shekhawat and
Mr. Karan Gaur, Advs.
versus
VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr.
Sidhant
Kumar,
Ms.
Manyaa
Chandok,
Mr. Gurpreet Singh Bagga and
Ms. Vidhi Udayshankar, Advs.
for R-1
Ms.
Ruby
S.
Ahuja,
Ms.
Manmeet
Kaur,
Ms. Hancy Maini, Ms. Anjali
Dwivedi and Mr. Lakshya
Khanna, Advs. for R-2
AND
+ O.M.P. (COMM) 265/2019 & I.A. 9346/2019
GAURAV DALMIA
..... Petitioner
Through:
Ms.
Ruby
S.
Ahuja,
Ms.
Manmeet
Kaur,
Ms. Hancy Maini, Ms. Anjali
Digitally Signed
By:JYOTIRMOY GHOSH
DASTIDAR
Signing Date:23.05.2023
19:28:22
Signature Not Verified
Dwivedi and Mr. Lakshya
Khanna, Advs.
versus
VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr.
Sidhant
Kumar,
Ms.
Manyaa
Chandok,
Mr. Gurpreet Singh Bagga and
Ms. Vidhi Udayshankar, Advs.
for R-1
Mr. Ashwini Kumar Mata, Sr.
Adv. with Mr. Sujoy Datta,
Ms. Nishtha Khurana,
Ms. Mahima Shekhawat and
Mr. Karan Gaur, Advs. for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
J U D G M E N T
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
1.
The present petitions have been filed under Section 34 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 („Act of 1996‟, in short). Since
the petitions are challenging the same Arbitral Award dated March 25,
2019, I shall decide these petitions by a common order.
2.
The petitioners, Pranav Ansal and Gaurav Dalmia are the
promoter-shareholder of Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.
(„APIL‟, for short) and the Chairman of Landmark Group,
respectively. Landmark Group and Ansal Group entered into a Joint
Venture Company („JV‟, for short) on September 13, 2004, which later
Digitally Signed
By:JYOTIRMOY GHOSH
DASTIDAR
Signing Date:23.05.2023
19:28:22
Signature Not Verified
came to be known as Ansal Landmark Township Private Limited
(„ALTPL‟, for short), (presently under majority control of Ansal
Group), to undertake real estate projects. Subsequently, the JV was
terminated by the parties through a Term Sheet Agreement dated
December 21, 2011, and Definitive Agreements executed as per the
Term Sheet. The JV would incorporate an entity, which would be
transferred to Landmark Group. This entity named Ansal Landmark
(Karnal) Township Private Limited („ALKTPL‟, for short), was to
implement the „Karnal project‟.
3.
As per the petitioners, a Debenture Subscription Agreement
(„DSA‟, for short) and a Deed of Personal Guarantee („DPG‟, for
short), were executed on July 28, 2015. As per the DSA, an entity
namely Ansal Urban Condominiums Private Limited (hereinafter
referred to as „AUCPL‟ and „Principal Borrower‟ interchangeably) was
to implement a Group Housing Project at Ghaziabad.
4.
The DSA dated July 28, 2015, was entered into between the
following parties:-
a.
AUCPL
b.
ALTPL
c.
ALKTPL
d.
Sushil Ansal
e.
Gaurav
Dalmia
(petitioner
in
OMP
(COMM) 265/2019)
f.
Pranav Ansal (petitioner in OMP (COMM)
290/2019)
g.
APIL
Digitally Signed
By:JYOTIRMOY GHOSH
DASTIDAR
Signing Date:23.05.2023
19:28:22
Signature Not Verified
h.
Indostar
Capital
Finance
Limited
(„Indostar‟, hereinafter)
5.
As per the DSA, Indostar invested ₹ 150 crore in AUCPL by
subscribing 1,50,00,000 secured, unlisted, redeemable, non-convertible
debentures at the face value of ₹100. These debentures were to be
redeemed in tranches, with a validity of 36 months from the closing
date. As per Article 2.1.1 read with Article 2(ii) of Terms of
Debentures, AUCPL was to pay interest @ 21.75% per annum from
the date Indostar remits the money.
6.
AUCPL failed to make the payment for the debentures by July
31, 2017, causing an „event of defau