SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 32529

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
DEVENDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT) OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates:
FARAZ MAQBOOL (DHCLSC)

O R D E R

% 09.12.2024

1. The order dated 18.10.2024 passed by the Respondent authorities indicates that the application filed by the petitioner seeking parole was rejected on the ground that the petitioner had violated the terms and conditions of the parole granted previously.

2. It is pointed out that the petitioner was released on parole on an earlier occasion on 12.10.2018 for a period of one month. He, however, jumped the parole and was taken in custody on 13.09.2022. Clearly, the same is a serious violation of the terms and conditions of release of convict on parole.

3. The object of grant of parole or furlough is to afford relief to the convicts in the form of temporary release from prison as a progressive measure of correctional services. It is aimed as an opportunity for the prisoner to maintain familial relations and to W.P.(CRL) 1985/2024 Page 1 of 3 act as a motivation for them to maintain good conduct while in prison. The Hon’ble Apex Court in Asfaq v. State of Rajasthan and Others : (2017) 15 SCC 55 while summarising the difference between parole and furlough, and the grounds to grant the same observed as under:

“11. There is a subtle distinction between parole and furlou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top