SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 17295

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA, J
RAJ RANI – Appellant
Versus
DDA & ORS. – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Sumit Bansal, Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar, Mr. Pushkar Khanna & Mr. Utsav Garg, Advs.

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner is invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, for issuance of appropriate direction for quashing of the impugned order dated 24.09.2007, by which the respondent No. 1/DDA, [Delhi Development Authority] has cancelled the Conveyance Deed dated 13.04.2004 in respect of the flat bearing No. E-76, Aravali C.G.H.S. Ltd., Plot No. 44, Sector -13, Rohini, Delhi, [Flat in question], and thereby seeking restoration of the Conveyance Deed and further direction not to disturb the peaceful enjoyment of the flat in question.

BRIEF FACTS:

2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that the petitioner purchased the flat in question from the respondent No.2, [Smt. Bimla Jain] vide an Agreement to Sell dated 30.12.1998. Following the purchase, the petitioner approached DDA for the conversion of the flat in question from leasehold to freehold, and subsequently DDA converted the flat to freehold and executed a Conveyance Deed in favour of the petitioner on 13.04.2004, which was duly registered on the same day with the office of the Sub-Registrar, Delhi and the petitioner became the owner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top