SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 12699

DELHI HIGH COURT
PUMA SE – Appellant
Versus
ALIKA HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD – Respondent


Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3289

CS(COMM) 61/2021

Page 1 of 6

$~5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CS(COMM) 61/2021

PUMA SE

..... Plaintiff

Through:

Mr. Ranjan Narula and Mr.

Shashi P. Ojha, Advs.

Versus

ALIKA HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD

..... Defendant

Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

%

08.05.2023

1.

The plaintiff alleges infringement, by the defendant, by use of

the mark PUMA for pharmaceutical products for pantoprazole tablets.

The defendant is manufacturing and selling its pantoprazole tablets

under the marks PUMA-DSR and PUMA-40.

2.

PUMA, both as a word mark as well as a device mark, stand

registered in favour of the plaintiff in various classes. The plaintiff

holds registrations of:

(i)

the word mark PUMA in Classes 18 and 25 w.e.f. 15th

February 1977 and w.e.f. 4th November 2015 in Class 35,

(ii)

the device mark

(a)

w.e.f. 25th February 1986 in Class 18,

(b)

w.e.f. 3rd October 1991 in Class 24,

(c)

w.e.f. 22nd February 1996 in Classes 3 and 9,

Digitally Signed

By:KAMLA RAWAT

Signing Date:12.05.2023

16:19:45

Signature Not Verified

Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top