DELHI HIGH COURT
PUMA SE – Appellant
Versus
ALIKA HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD – Respondent
Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:3289
CS(COMM) 61/2021
Page 1 of 6
$~5
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CS(COMM) 61/2021
PUMA SE
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr. Ranjan Narula and Mr.
Shashi P. Ojha, Advs.
Versus
ALIKA HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD
..... Defendant
Through:
None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
%
08.05.2023
1.
The plaintiff alleges infringement, by the defendant, by use of
the mark PUMA for pharmaceutical products for pantoprazole tablets.
The defendant is manufacturing and selling its pantoprazole tablets
under the marks PUMA-DSR and PUMA-40.
2.
PUMA, both as a word mark as well as a device mark, stand
registered in favour of the plaintiff in various classes. The plaintiff
holds registrations of:
(i)
the word mark PUMA in Classes 18 and 25 w.e.f. 15th
February 1977 and w.e.f. 4th November 2015 in Class 35,
(ii)
the device mark
(a)
w.e.f. 25th February 1986 in Class 18,
(b)
w.e.f. 3rd October 1991 in Class 24,
(c)
w.e.f. 22nd February 1996 in Classes 3 and 9,
Digitally Signed
By:KAMLA RAWAT
Signing Date:12.05.2023
16:19:45
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.