2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 22647
DELHI HIGH COURT
ASHA GUPTA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATON THROUGH COMMISSIONER & ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-12260/2021 2023:DHC:6674-DB
W.P.(C.) No.12260/2021
Page 1 of 19
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment reserved on: 25.08.2023
%
Judgment delivered on: 15.09.2023
+
W.P.(C) 12260/2021 & CM APPL. 38363/2021
ASHA GUPTA & ANR.
..... Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Jatin Kumar, Mr. Bikram Gupta,
Advocates
versus
SOUTH
DELHI
MUNICIPAL
CORPORATON
THROUGH
COMMISSIONER & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Dhanesh Relan, SC with Mr.
Arindam Dey and Mr. Aditya Pandey,
Advocates for R-1.
Ms. Monika Tripathy, SC with Mr.
Chiranjan Saha and Mr. Rony John,
Advocates for R-2.
Ms. K. Iyer and Mr. C.R. Dutta
Biswas, Advocates for R-4.
Mr. Sandeep Chatterjee and Mr.
Sanyam Suri, Advocates for R-5.
Mr. Shoumendu Mukherjee, SPC
with Ms. Megha Sharma, Advocates
for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
J U D G M E N T
Digitaaly Signed
By:BHUPINDER SINGH
ROHELLA
Signing Date:15.09.2023
10:59:48
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C.) No.12260/2021
Page 2 of 19
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, C.J.
1.
The present writ petition has been filed by Mrs. Asha Gupta and Mr.
Jayanta Ghoshal (collectively referred to as the “Petitioners”) who are the
owners-in-possession of the First Floor; and Second Floor forming a part of
an immovable property situated at Plot No.108, Pocket 40, Chittaranjan
Park, New Delhi 110019 (the “Identified Property”) and have filed this
present writ petition aggrieved on account of re-development of an adjacent
property i.e., an immovable property bearing No. 119 situated at Pocket 40,
Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi 110019 (the “Subject Property”) wherein
Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 i.e., the joint owners of the Subject Property have
demolished the original superstructure on the Subject Property and have
commenced construction de novoon the Subject Property(the “Writ
Petition”).
2.
The brief facts leading to the filling of this Writ Petition are that the
Delhi Development Authority (the “DDA”) developed Pocket 40,
Chittaranjan Park, New Delhi (the “Identified Land”) by way of plotting the
Identified Land for the purpose of a planned residential colony by carving
out plots admeasuring approximately 135.45 Sq. Meters, each. The
Identified Property situated on the Identified Land was allotted jointly to Mr.
Deepak Kumar and Ms. Purabi Ray vide a lease deed dated 15.10.1990 (the
“Original Allotees”). Pertinently, requisite sanction was accorded on
26.12.2000to the construction site plan by the erstwhile South Delhi
Municipal Corporation (“SDMC” or “Respondent No. 1”) (now merged as
the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (the “MCD”)) for the construction of
Ground Floor, First Floor and Second Floor over the Identified Property
Digitaaly Signed
By:BHUPINDER SINGH
ROHELLA
Signing Date:15.09.2023
10:59:48
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C.) No.12260/2021
Page 3 of 19
keeping in view the Master Plan for Delhi, 2001 (“MPD 2001”) and other
laws applicable at the relevant point of time.
3.
Thereafter, vide a sale deed dated 22.04.2004, Petitioner No.2
purchased the First Floor forming a part of the Identified Property from one
Mr. Bibash Nag Chowdhari who had in turn purchased the same from the
Original Allotees. Additionally, vide a sale deed dated 11.10.2010,
Petitioner No.1 purchased the Second Floor forming a part of the Identified
Property from one Ms. Beli Banik who had in turn purchased the same from
the Original Allotees. The Petitioners are admittedly, second purchasers of
their respective floors forming a part of the Identified Property.
4.
It is stated that on 1.20.2021, the Petitioners‟ noticed that building
pillars were being erected near the rear boundary wall of the Subject
Property i.e., the common wall between the Identified Property and the
Subject Property without provisioning for any setback/gap/space from the
setback line of the rear façade of the superstructure to the outer-boundary
wall (“Rear Setback”). Thus, the Petitione