SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 7595

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ESHA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
ROHIT VIG – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHIM SHRIDHAR

%

20.02.2023

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

1.

There is no representation on behalf of the parties.

1.1.

Adverse orders are deferred.

2.

We may also note that written submissions, as directed, have not been

filed. Parties will file their written submissions in the matter, in accordance

with the directions already issued.

3.

List the matter on 04.10.2023.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

FEBRUARY 20, 2023/aj

Present :

Mr S. Srivastava, Advocate for the appellant.

4.

At this stage, Mr S. Srivastava enters appearance on behalf of the

appellant. Mr Srivastava says he has been recently assigned the case and that

he will file his Vakalatnama within the next ten (10) days.

FAO(OS) (COMM) 2/2020

page 1 of 2

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2024 at 19:21:50

5.

Mr Srivastava has been apprised of the directions passed today, as

also the next date of hearing.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

aj

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

FAO(OS) (COMM) 2/2020

page 2 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top