SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 15860

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SATYAPAL SINGH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORAITON AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
HARSH AHUJA

O R D E R

% 10.09.2024

1. The petitioner in the instant writ petition seeks for directions to respondent No.1 to cover the open drain/nalla i.e. Palam link drain allegedly flowing through Mahavir Encalve; Mahavir Vihar, Pocket 1 & 2 Dwarka Sector 1.

2. During the pendency of the instant writ petition, various directions came to be passed and Status Report has also been filed by the respondent- Corporation. The respondents, while placing reliance on the directions passed by the National Green Tribunal submit that the prayer made in the instant writ petition cannot be acceded to on account of the said directions.

3. Having briefly considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the Court is of the considered opinion that if the petitioner has any grievance, the appropriate recourse is to agitate the same before the concerned Executive Magistrate, as envisaged in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [“Sanhita”]. The Court takes note of the provisions enshrined in Chapter XI (B) and (C) of the Sanhita and finds that Sections 152 to 163 therein provide a mechanism as to how such a grievance can be redressed by the District Magistrate or by a Sub-Divisional Magi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top